Overview
| Comment: | Cite the flat repostate §8.3 name-resolution procedure on its resolution tests instead of §8.3.N subsection numbers, since §8.3 is a numbered list of forms rather than a set of subsection headings and the per-form intent is already in each test name. |
|---|---|
| Timelines: | family | ancestors | descendants | both | trunk |
| Files: | files | file ages | folders |
| SHA3-256: |
3d154570ab1b7fda4485328d5805f468 |
| User & Date: | dmestas on 2026-07-14 01:39:56.151 |
| Other Links: | manifest | tags |
Context
|
2026-07-14
| ||
| 02:13 | Drop two tautological assertions in the push-intent and inbound-gimme predicates: each merely restates the boolean defined on the line directly above it and so can never fail, leaving them as noise rather than a check of any invariant a bug could violate. check-in: eea9f66041 user: dmestas tags: trunk | |
| 01:39 | Cite the flat repostate §8.3 name-resolution procedure on its resolution tests instead of §8.3.N subsection numbers, since §8.3 is a numbered list of forms rather than a set of subsection headings and the per-form intent is already in each test name. check-in: 3d154570ab user: dmestas tags: trunk | |
| 01:26 | Cite artifact §6.2 on the empty-content self-checksum test so the expected MD5 of empty input follows from the self-checksum definition instead of standing without a section reference. check-in: 7ca4474047 user: dmestas tags: trunk | |
Changes
Modified src/repostate.zig
from [8871a8047d]
to [6926360fb0].
[diff]
Modified src/repostate_test.zig
from [b4ea3d2219]
to [27963d56e1].
[diff]