Timeline

zit serve accepts one connection at a time and read its request head and body with no deadline, so a single peer that opened a connection and then dribbled or withheld its request pinned the accept loop and starved every other client -- a real availability gap the in-memory fuzzers could not see, since they never touch the socket. The connection now runs under a whole-connection deadline: the request work races a timed sleep, and a peer that misses the deadline is dropped so the loop moves on. The bind is loopback only and the deadline is generous, so a legitimate request -- even at the reply ceiling -- always finishes far inside it; only a stalled peer is shed. Four end-to-end abuses -- a slow-loris head, a half-sent body, a mid-response disconnect, an idle-connection burst -- each prove the server still answers a fresh request and a real clone still converges, and the fix is shown to be load-bearing by wedging with it removed. A per-read idle timeout and a configurable value are left for later. check-in: 56c17d0675 user: dmestas tags: trunk

zit serve accepts one connection to completion before the next (single-threaded, serve.zig), and receiveHead plus the body read blocked with no deadline. A loopback peer that dribbles a request head, half-sends a body, or connects idle and holds could pin the accept loop forever -- the socket read path the exchange fuzzers never reach, covered before only by happy-path interop.

Add a whole-connection deadline: the request work runs on its own unit of concurrency raced against a timed sleep, and draining the loser cancels the blocked read, freeing the loop. A per-read SO_RCVTIMEO is unusable here (the Io backend treats a socket-timeout EAGAIN as a bug). serve binds 127.0.0.1 only, so a legitimate same-host request finishes in milliseconds even at the 512 MiB body ceiling; the 5 s bound never fires on a real client and only sheds a stalled one.

Four end-to-end scenarios abuse a live server over loopback -- dribbled head, half-sent body, mid-response disconnect, idle-connection burst -- and assert with bounded waits that a fresh request is still answered and a clone still converges (sync 3.7). closed check-in: e87fb840d1 user: dmestas tags: h11-serve-socket

The working tree -- the one place a version-control tool can lose a user's data -- had no crash simulation; only the log store did. A new faulty directory layer tears and freezes writes at a seeded crash point, and a sweep replays an update across every crash cut, reopens, and checks four invariants. Three hold: an untracked file the update must preserve is never touched, a crashed update recovers to its target through the undo journal, and the checkout record never names a check-in whose tree did not finish materializing. The fourth does not, and that is the point of the harness: the payload write lands in place rather than through the write-temp-and-rename the metadata already uses, so a crash mid-write can leave a managed file spliced from old and new bytes -- torn, but recoverable. The gate runs the three that hold; the fourth is pinned by a test asserting the splice IS produced, so it flips the day the write is made atomic. Crash-point enumeration follows TigerBeetle's storage model. check-in: 5401ce245f user: dmestas tags: trunk