Each was located by reading the draft text that supports what the code comment actually claims, then adversarially re-checked against a verbatim quote of those lines. Clamping a range into its section would satisfy the checker while pointing at the wrong paragraph, so the checker alone was never the gate.

Of 33 proposals, 2 were refuted on exactly that ground -- the quote verified byte-for-byte and still did not state the claim -- and 4 came back unresolved because no draft's §4.1 states what those comments assert at all. Those are mis-sectioned, not line-rotted, and need a section decision rather than a re-key.

Also restores container.zig's `decode` doc block, which 7d26a31305 left stranded above `decodePrefix` when that function was inserted between the comment and the function it describes.

test 3495/3495, fmt. Issue #18. check-in: e5db38a6df user: dmestas tags: sub-manifest