d4e0e0d6da fixed six renumbered sections and deliberately left their line ranges stale, on the reasoning that a correct section turns a stale range into an ordinary lookup. This is that lookup: 20 of 100 survived review.

The 20 percent hit rate is lower than the pass before it, and the reason is worth recording. It is NOT that the renumbering targets were wrong -- §11.1 L2604-2607 reads identically before and after that commit, so those citations were never renumbered by it. What the pass found instead is a second, older layer of mis-sectioning underneath the first: claims about server-emitted error cards citing §11.1 Credential Replay when they belong in §10.1 Error Card. Fixing one generation of drift exposed the next.

Two refusals name failure modes the applier could not have caught. One proposal re-keyed half of a COMPOUND citation -- sync.zig:961 carries `§9.3 L3278/L3320-3322` -- which would have welded a freshly verified range to a still-rotted one on the same line. Another submitted a quote that stopped mid-word, with the half of the claim it needed sitting in the sentence it cut off.

The 66 unresolved are now the honest core: three independent adversarial passes have each declined to invent an answer for them.

Baseline 100 to 80; 90 percent of citations now resolve. test 3495/3495, fmt. Issue #18. check-in: dcd6c48df9 user: dmestas tags: sub-manifest