Six cited sections do not exist in the drafts at all, so no line range could ever have been right. Each was renumbered, and each successor is confirmed by subject match against the section's own text:

§B.4 -> §B Appendix B flattened; cookie-card, url-login-value, pct-user, unreserved and pct-encoded all still exist, every citation exactly 1787 lines above its production §12.1 -> §11.1 Credential Replay §12.2 -> §11.2 Private-Content Exposure and Protected Transport §10.3 -> §9.3 Configuration Exchange -- "the server MUST require Admin; otherwise emit error not authorized to push" §10.4 -> §9.4 Commit-Lock Pragmas -- every site is ci-lock/ci-unlock §9.1.1 -> §8.5.1 Unversioned-File Synchronisation -- "status 3+MTIME-CMP (2 older, 3 identical, 4 newer)"

The §B citations carry corrected line numbers, each asserted to land on the production its comment names. The rest carry the section only: once the section is right the stale range is an ordinary "outside" case, which the re-key pass already handles, and inventing a range here would be the clamping this work exists to prevent.

Deliberately untouched, all needing a decision rather than a lookup: §12.3 (successor §11.3 states the OPPOSITE -- "This protocol defines no separate per-line byte limit before LF" -- while four tests assert a 65535-byte bound as an RFC requirement), §3.10 (removed; the comment reasons about the section's own existence), and §E (a reference to storage-track-plan.md wearing §-notation, which the issue forbids).

not-a-section 36 to 6. Baseline 144 to 135. test 3495/3495, fmt. Issue #18. check-in: d4e0e0d6da user: dmestas tags: sub-manifest