Tags and Properties for Check-in 98ddd81b75
- branch=trunk inherited from [da85dd4acf]
- comment=fossil_convert: mint FLAT when the names do not partition (#126) Committed under a wrong description, corrected here. The message claimed this silenced an unused parameter and left two tests failing; it does neither. The content is the finished #126 fix -- appendRun honours flat, materializing the whole effective entry set rather than falling through to the S run -- and the suite is green. The stub I described was a transient reversion in the shared checkout, made to prove the new regression test fails without the fix. It was restored before I committed. fossil commit auto-syncs, so my commit captured the restored tree while my message described the tree I had read minutes earlier. Authored by the #126 work, not by this commit's message. added by [f264ba4fa3] on 2026-08-24 00:04:15
- sym-trunk inherited from [da85dd4acf]
Context
|
2026-08-24
| ||
| 00:04 | • Edit [98ddd81b75]: Edit check-in comment. artifact: f264ba4fa3 user: dmestas | |
|
2026-08-23
| ||
| 23:47 |
fossil_convert: mint FLAT when the names do not partition (#126)
Committed under a wrong description, corrected here. The message claimed this silenced an unused parameter and left two tests failing; it does neither. The content is the finished #126 fix -- appendRun honours flat, materializing the whole effective entry set rather than falling through to the S run -- and the suite is green. The stub I described was a transient reversion in the shared checkout, made to prove the new regression test fails without the fix. It was restored before I committed. fossil commit auto-syncs, so my commit captured the restored tree while my message described the tree I had read minutes earlier. Authored by the #126 work, not by this commit's message. check-in: 98ddd81b75 user: dmestas tags: trunk | |
|
2026-07-08
| ||
| 21:43 | initial empty check-in check-in: da85dd4acf user: dmestas tags: trunk | |