Every earlier pass asked only for a line re-key WITHIN the cited section. A citation whose claim lived in a different section could therefore only come back "unresolved" -- even when the agent had already found the right answer and written it into its reason field. Four rounds of that read as "these need a human", when what it actually showed was that the prompt never permitted the fix.

This pass let each repair choose its own kind. Of 126 confirmed: 63 changed the SECTION, 41 re-keyed a range, and 22 rewrote a claim the drafts no longer make. 104 of those were structurally unproposable before. Unresolved fell from 67 to 5.

The claim rewrites are the ones worth reading. reply_body_cap was documented as an RFC-mandated 512 MiB ceiling; section 4 L830-833 states the opposite, that Fossil imposes no such entity limit, so it is now documented as a zit-local cap -- the same repair the 65535-byte line bound got earlier. A verbatim quotation attributed to the draft, "The card MUST consist of exactly two whitespace-separated tokens", does not appear in it; section 10.2 L2118 says "Exactly two visible tokens are required."

42 review verdicts were refused and are not applied. Two refute agents died mid-run; their proposals were left unapplied rather than taken on trust, and one refute agent lost to a stalled stream cost 14 repairs that the completed run later recovered.

Broken 172 to 42, 96 percent of citations resolving, 0 unresolvable sections. test 3500/3500, fmt. Issue #18. check-in: 76a2905055 user: dmestas tags: sub-manifest