Of 475 candidates, 368 were located by reading the draft text that supports what each comment claims and survived adversarial review; 23 were refuted and 84 returned unresolved. sync.zig and sync_test.zig now resolve at 86 percent, up from 39.

The refusals are the useful part. Several proposals verified byte-for-byte and still pointed at the wrong sentence; one range truncated away the half that carried the claim; one cited text that REFUTES its comment. The unresolved are mostly mis-sectioned rather than mis-lined -- §9.1 cited for push/pull card grammar, §10.1 for the client-version pragma -- and one where an erratum inverted the claim, so the COMMENT is now wrong and no line range would fix it. Those are left for a section decision.

The checker also could not see `§A.1`-style citations at all: 36 of them, unverified while looking checked, 25 of them broken. Appendix headers use `Appendix A. Title` and `A.1. Title`, so both forms are recognised now.

Baseline 477 to 144, over a population that grew 781 to 817.

test 3495/3495, fmt. Issue #18. check-in: 18e5fa7bbb user: dmestas tags: sub-manifest