Check-in [01dc9f8e8a]

Lands the B6 increment (d8e5e811) on trunk. The fix itself is unchanged from that commit and its full reasoning is recorded there; this message covers the landing, because the merge was not a formality.

WHAT B6 FIXES

`tag` was read-only. `tag list` was the only subcommand, so a repository could not be given a name for a check-in at all. Unlike the other five blockers this was not a wrong answer — the verb told the truth about what existed — but the capability was simply absent. `zit tag add NAME CHECKIN` now mints one CONTROL artifact carrying a single `T +sym-NAME` card, targeting the resolved check-in's 64-hex hash.

THE SIGN IS THE WHOLE CORRECTNESS ARGUMENT

The card is a SINGLETON (`+`), not a propagating (`*`) tag. `resolveName` (src/repostate.zig:891) picks the max-`event.mtime` check-in among ALL active `sym-` rows, so a propagating `*sym-v1` would be inherited by every descendant and then resolve to the NEWEST of them — the name would silently drift off the check-in the user tagged, which is the same class of wrong answer as B1. `applyTagOps` (src/repostate.zig:727) gates propagation on `op.type != .singleton`, so a `+` card pins the name with ZERO repostate changes. The contrast with a branch is deliberate: a *branch* sym propagates precisely because descendants must inherit it; a *tag* sym does not, precisely because they must not.

CONFLICT RESOLUTION, STATED

One conflict, src/e2e.zig, positional rather than semantic: trunk's B5 block and B6's block are both appended at the end of the file over an empty common ancestor. Fossil again emitted the five-part conflict rather than the usual four — a "####### SUGGESTED CONFLICT RESOLUTION follows" section carrying its own proposed merge sits between the local copy and the ancestor section. Splitting only on the four familiar markers swallows that separator into the kept text, which then compiles as garbage; B3's landing recorded the same trap and it recurred here verbatim.

The two candidate sections were compared before choosing: the SUGGESTED section and the MERGED IN section are byte-identical (257 lines each), and the common ancestor is a single empty line. The resolution keeps trunk's 8 B5 tests plus exactly one copy of B6's 5-test block. Verified post-resolution: no residual marker of any of the five kinds, 432 tests in the file, no duplicated test name, and the B3 (5), B5 (8) and B6 (7) blocks all present at their expected counts. One further edit was needed — the splice left a doubled blank line at the seam, which `zig fmt` flagged; the reformat is that one blank line and nothing else.

TEST EVIDENCE ON THE MERGED TREE

Re-verified on trunk after the merge, not inherited from the branch: `zig fmt --check .`, `zig build`, `zig build test`, `zig build e2e` (432/432, no filtering), `zig build dst` (6 seeds x 1000 steps) and `zig build smoke` (S1-S6) each exit 0. `fossil extras --dotfiles` is empty.

The blocker repro was also driven by hand against the rebuilt merged binary rather than inferred from the source: `zit tag add v1 tip` exits 0 and prints the artifact hash; after a second commit `zit cat a.txt v1` is the tagged content while `zit cat a.txt tip` is the newer one, and `zit tag list tip` does NOT carry v1 — the singleton pins and is not inherited. `zit tag add v1` alone is a usage error at exit 2, and `zit tag add v2 nosuchcheckin` exits 1 naming the check-in and leaves no tag behind.

CHANGED EXPECTATIONS (all three encoded the missing capability, nothing else)

cli tag B-tag-7 (src/cli.zig) and cli tag B-tag-13 (src/e2e.zig) used the literal token `add` as their stand-in for "not a subcommand". `add` IS one now, so both use `cancel`, a word that still is not — cancel/remove semantics stay deferred to 0.2. cli tag B-tag-11's verbatim `tag_help_expected` gains the `add` usage line and its paragraph, because `tag --help` must teach the new grammar. The diff was audited for other expectation changes and there are none.

RECORDED, NOT ASSUMED: branch creation shares no read-only gap. It is already served by `commit --branch`, which mints the propagating branch/sym pair directly on the check-in manifest (src/cli.zig `composeCommitTags`), so there is no `branch add` to write.

No borrowed technique: the singleton-sign argument and the `mintControlArtifact` extraction are original to this change. No performance claim is made. check-in: a5b6db7a8c user: dmestas tags: trunk

The sweep could not finish inside its own 10-minute step timeout. Per-target cost varies by roughly 276x across the corpus: artifact_parse_garbage runs 100 rounds in 0.18s, while logstore_pack_same_path_round_trip takes 49s because it performs a full store pack every round. At 2000 rounds that single target needs about 16 minutes on its own.

The original figure was extrapolated from one cheap target on the assumption that per-round cost was roughly uniform. It is not, and the assumption was never measured. 100 rounds is measured: the full 27-target sweep takes about 76s.

This makes CI fuzzing a regression check — every target still runs clean on every push — rather than a bug hunt. Finding new defects needs depth, and depth belongs in an out-of-band run with its own budget, where a long sweep costs nobody a merge. check-in: 861b223e3c user: dmestas tags: trunk

A symlink anywhere in the checkout permanently wedged `commit`. `extras.zig` classifies a symlink as an extra (B-extras-9), and the recursive `add DIR` / `addremove` paths reuse that sweep as their add set without re-applying the kind test that explicit `zit add sym.txt` and `commit` both apply. The recursive path therefore TRACKED exactly what the direct path REFUSED: after `zit add .`, every subsequent `zit commit` died with "cannot commit 'sym.txt': not a regular file", `zit status` called an on-disk file missing, and the only way out (`zit rm sym.txt`) was named nowhere. `add .` is the documented whole-tree workflow, so any repo containing a symlink was stuck.

WHAT CHANGED

Consistent refusal: 0.1.0 does not version symlinks, on every path.

1. `extras.Extras` entries widen from a bare path to `Entry{path, is_symlink}`. The sweep already lstat-classified every entry (`resolveKind`); the verdict now rides out on the entry instead of being re-derived by callers. That is the point of the shape: `add` and `addremove` do NOT re-stat swept items, so the two paths cannot drift from the deep module's classification again — which is the mechanism of this bug. Ordering is unchanged (sort is by `path`; `is_symlink` never participates), and every postcondition assert is preserved.

2. The five `items()` consumers split by role. `extras` and `clean` ignore the tag — enumerating verbs do not judge, and a symlink stays a listable, deletable extra. `add`'s directory sweep and `addremove`'s insert loop filter on it.

3. `classifyPath`'s catch-all `else => .not_regular` splits: `.sym_link` gets its own `Outcome` and the wording `symlink (not versioned in 0.1.0)`; a fifo/socket/device keeps "not a regular file". Those are not the same refusal and must not read as one. The wording is one shared const so the explicit refusal and the recursive skip notice cannot diverge.

4. `commit`'s `Capture.not_regular` carries whether the entry was a symlink, and `commitNotRegular` renders the recovery for that case: "run 'zit rm PATH' to stop tracking it". This is how repos already wedged by a pre-fix `add .` get out; there is no migration code and none is needed.

REPORTING DECISION (stated, not implied)

`add` prints each skip to stderr, alongside its existing already-tracked notice: add's contract is per-argument feedback. `addremove` withholds symlinks SILENTLY. Its report is a two-channel ADDED/REMOVED ledger of state transitions, and a skipped symlink is a non-transition; growing a third notice channel there would change the shape of a report other tooling reads. `zit extras` is the verb that shows the symlink is still present and untracked.

`status` needed no change: post-fix the symlink is simply untracked.

TESTS

Five e2e regressions, marker `// REGRESSION B3:`: the breakdown doc's repro chain verbatim (init/add ./commit/status/extras); an `addremove` variant with symlinks sorting BOTH before and after the regular file the sweep also yields, so a filter that latched off the previous item's kind fails one of the two; explicit `add sym.txt` refusing with the symlink wording and tracking nothing; the wedge-recovery chain (pre-tracked symlink -> commit names `zit rm` -> rm -> commit succeeds -> status clean); and a `clean --dry-run` contract-partner guard that was green before the fix and stays green through it, proving clean still lists a symlink as an extra after the `Extras` type change. A unit assertion in `extras.zig` pins the tag itself, and `commitNotRegular`'s renderer test covers both branches.

Two pre-existing e2e expectations changed, both because they encoded the bug or its wording:

- `cli addremove B-addremove-2` asserted the ADDED set was byte-identical to `zit extras`, symlink included. That identity IS the defect. It now asserts the add set is the extras set MINUS symlinks, and additionally that the symlink remains an extra. - `cli add B-add-5` asserted the fifo-generic wording for a named symlink. It now asserts the symlink-specific wording.

Four `commit` invocations inside the new B3 tests use `runCommitEnv` with an explicit user rather than bare `runZit`; the isolated e2e environment has no resolvable author, which is a harness requirement, not a behavior change.

TEST EVIDENCE

In this worktree at the committed tree: `zig fmt --check .`, `zig build`, `zig build test`, `zig build e2e` (417 tests) and `zig build dst` each exit 0 — full battery, no filtering. Pre-fix the four B3 repro tests failed and the `clean --dry-run` guard passed, as designed.

No borrowed technique: the entry-tag shape is original to this change. No performance claim is made. check-in: 1aeb531cac user: dmestas tags: blockers