Artifact c38da5b1cfc8477d3b26e8dd45976445e42960c86a29b7b51bd5e9bdc7e95d02:
- File
conformance/requirements/sparse-cone.tsv
— part of check-in
[b907b41650]
at
2026-10-20 00:25:58
on branch feat/submanifest-reader
— test(conformance): cover the sparse store's step-3 requirements
Cases elide out-of-cone blobs from a dense clone, as a cone-scoped clone would leave the store. They check the three absence classes, the client and server sync filters, recomputation on a cone change, loss of the cone (unreadable, or dropped by fossil rebuild, after which fossil's pull heals the store), verify and rebuild counts, R-card omission and skipping, a commit over elided subtrees pushed to a dense peer, widening, hybrid histories, and delta bases.
Holding out-of-cone sub-manifest nodes is recorded as a deviation from §5.1. zit holds them too, because a tree that cannot be enumerated never links.
A checkout's record names the phantom for a file that neither cone covers, so a checkout opens over a sparse store. (user: [email protected], size: 11319) [annotate] [blame] [check-ins using]
# Requirements of draft-fossil-sparse-cone-00, written from the draft text. # Implemented: the cone specification (§3) and the sparse worktree (§4), # Appendix A steps 1 and 2, and the sparse store's elided-phantom # classification and verification semantics (§5), step 3. The sync extension # (§6) and narrow-then-compact are later phases; their rows carry a scope # note naming the Appendix A step that covers them, and no case yet. Step 3's # cases make a store sparse the way a cone-scoped clone would leave it, since # nothing before step 4 fills one. §6.2's last sentence, a recipient's # classification of a delta's base, is step 3's classifier and is covered. # Skipped, with reasons: 1 (introduction), 4.5 and 7's last two paragraphs # (informative), 6.5 (a statement of non-guarantee with no behaviour), 9 # (IANA). §3.6's second paragraph, which still calls exclusion members out # of scope, is stale text (tracked in danmestas/zit#242): the suite follows # §3.3 and zit, which implement them. Where the draft is silent the # reference is zit, the other implementation: its serialized form # (src/cone.zig, byte-identical here and checked against zit in # testdata/zit-cones), its refusal of an empty inclusion list, and its # exact-member removal. # Format: <id>\t<section>\t<requirement>[\t<scope note>] # draft draft-fossil-sparse-cone-00.txt 22f7c2d847a31bc88f190325f3e8b6b05c6aa80880b8610839d4762a709cbccd SC-2-1 2 A member covers a path when it equals the path or is a prefix of it ending at a '/' boundary; the absent cone covers everything (dense operation). an empty cone cannot be built, as in zit: at least one inclusion is required SC-3.1-1 3.1 A worktree cone is checkout-local state recorded with the checkout's other local records; it is not an artifact, does not synchronize, and affects no artifact's bytes or name. SC-3.1-2 3.1 A cone may be widened or narrowed at any time. SC-3.1-3 3.1 The canonical serialization marks a cone carrying members of other kinds with a distinct version, and an implementation that does not understand a version refuses the cone rather than reading it as path members. SC-3.1-4 3.1 Refusal of a store cone is policy loss: the store heals toward dense. SC-3.2-1 3.2 Members are normalized through the worktree-path validation applied to tracked paths: no dot or dot-dot components, no empty components, no reserved roots. SC-3.2-2 3.2 A member covered by another member of the same polarity with no opposite-polarity member between them is removed, and the normalized cone is what classification uses. SC-3.2-3 3.2 At least 64 members are supported, and 255 should be. SC-3.3-1 3.3 Coverage is decided by the longest member of either polarity that covers the path, which is order-independent, so the canonical sorted serialization and the digest do not depend on input order. SC-3.3-2 3.3 Polarity may alternate along a nesting chain: a subtree excluded from an inclusion may contain a deeper re-inclusion. SC-3.3-3 3.3 A member whose nearest covering member has the same polarity is redundant and is removed. SC-3.3-4 3.3 An exclusion that no inclusion covers is a dead rule and is refused. SC-3.3-5 3.3 One path carried with both polarities is a contradiction and is refused. SC-3.3-6 3.3 A key range wholly inside an inclusion and outside every exclusion classifies as before; a range an exclusion intersects is classified per file, at no cost to correctness. SC-3.4-1 3.4 Members are literal path prefixes; glob and pattern members are not part of the mechanism. SC-3.4-2 3.4 A member names a directory subtree or a single file with equal standing. SC-3.5-1 3.5 Amending a cone by wholesale replacement and by member addition or removal are equivalent, and the incremental form should be offered. SC-3.5-2 3.5 Widening fetches what the cone newly covers (the policy form of demand fetch). over a dense store widening materializes from the store; demand fetch over a sparse store is Appendix A step 4 SC-3.5-3 3.5 Narrowing dematerializes and leaves reclamation to explicit compaction. SC-3.6-1 3.6 A member containing pattern metacharacters is rejected only where operators would plausibly expect expansion; otherwise literal treatment conforms. SC-4-1 4 The sparse worktree is available to any conforming repository, with flat or tree-structured manifests. SC-4.1-1 4.1 A checkout operation given a cone materializes exactly the covered files. SC-4.1-2 4.1 The managed-file record covers only in-cone files. SC-4.1-3 4.1 Status, untracked-file listing and bulk tracking operate within the cone; an uncovered on-disk path is neither reported as untracked nor eligible for tracking. SC-4.1-4 4.1 A request to track a path outside the cone is refused, and the refusal names the cone as the reason; a diagnostic that reports a missing file or alleges damage does not conform. SC-4.1-5 4.1 All file-set enumeration flows through the shared enumeration interface with the cone applied there as a range predicate, never filtered at individual call sites. SC-4.2-1 4.2 A commit from a sparse worktree produces a check-in whose file set is the in-cone files as observed in the worktree and the baseline's out-of-cone entries carried unchanged. SC-4.2-2 4.2 For flat manifests the baseline's out-of-cone F cards are copied byte-verbatim, merged in sorted order with the in-cone F cards. SC-4.2-3 4.2 For tree manifests only the sub-manifest nodes whose key range intersects the changed paths are rebuilt, and every untouched subtree is re-referenced by hash, its content not required. the writer rebuilds the canonical tree, which re-derives every untouched node byte-identically and stores none of them anew, but it reads every file's content, as the R card over a dense store does SC-4.2-4 4.2 The result is an ordinary check-in: a reader cannot detect that it was committed sparsely, and no new artifact form is introduced. SC-4.3-1 4.3 A sparse-worktree commit over a dense store may compute the R card by reading out-of-cone content from the store. SC-4.3-2 4.3 A commit over a sparse store omits the R card. SC-4.3-3 4.3 Verifiers do not treat an absent R card as damage. SC-4.3-4 4.3 A verifier checking a present R card during a sparse materialization computes the aggregate over the dense enumeration, reading out-of-cone content from the store. materialization verifies no R card; manifest.VerifyRCard, which every commit runs, always aggregates the dense enumeration SC-4.3-5 4.3 A verifier over a sparse store skips R verification rather than report disagreement. SC-4.4-1 4.4 Over a dense store, merge, update and revert apply changes to out-of-cone files to the record without materializing them. SC-4.4-2 4.4 The count of out-of-cone changes applied should be reported. SC-4.4-3 4.4 Read operations on an uncovered path over a dense store read the store: the cone governs materialization, not readability. SC-5-1 5 A sparse store requires tree manifests for the segment it elides; a flat segment may elide only its content blobs and holds its manifests densely. SC-5.1-1 5.1 A store sparse at a cone holds every manifest, every in-cone sub-manifest node and every blob an in-cone F card names, elided phantoms for out-of-cone nodes and blobs, and every non-manifest structural artifact densely. SC-5.2-1 5.2 Transit phantoms, shunned artifacts and elided phantoms are distinguished; synchronization does not spontaneously request an elided phantom, whose absence is healthy. SC-5.2-2 5.2 Elision is computed from the cone, not stored on the phantom: reclassification on cone change is recomputation, and losing the store cone should reclassify every elided phantom as a transit phantom. SC-5.2-3 5.2 Verification reports a store complete within its cone as healthy, reports elision counts distinctly from damage, and reports transit phantoms and damaged in-cone artifacts as for a dense store. SC-5.3-1 5.3 A commit over elided subtrees references them by hash without possession, and pushing such a check-in is sound. SC-5.3-2 5.3 A server should refuse to be a clone origin for cones it does not cover, unless configured as a partial mirror, with one error card and no content. not yet implemented: the sync extension, Appendix A step 4 SC-5.3-3 5.3 A client treats a clone-round reply that carries an error card and no clone progress as fatal. not yet implemented: the sync extension, Appendix A step 4 SC-5.4-1 5.4 Widening reclassifies the newly covered elided phantoms as transit phantoms and fetches them. SC-5.4-2 5.4 Narrowing does not by itself delete held content; only explicit compaction deletes, dropping artifacts both out-of-cone and unreferenced by any spine, through the store-rewrite machinery and its locks. not yet implemented: narrow-then-compact, Appendix A step 5 SC-5.5-1 5.5 The flat prefix of a hybrid history holds its manifests densely; its content blobs may be elided by F-card classification. SC-6.1-1 6.1 A cone-scoped pull or clone adds one pragma cone card per inclusion member, encoded exactly as an F-card filename, and one pragma cone-not card per exclusion. not yet implemented: the sync extension, Appendix A step 4 SC-6.1-2 6.1 For check-in content a cone-scoped request asks for spines, in-cone sub-manifest nodes and in-cone blobs, and neither expects nor requests the remainder. not yet implemented: the sync extension, Appendix A step 4 SC-6.2-1 6.2 A cone-aware server walks each check-in's tree descending only nodes whose key range intersects the cone, emits the spine, the in-cone nodes and blobs, and bounds the per-round walk as a dense clone bounds its batches. not yet implemented: the sync extension, Appendix A step 4 SC-6.2-2 6.2 A cone-aware server does not serve a delta whose base is outside the keep set it computed for the request; it serves that artifact in full form. not yet implemented: the sync extension, Appendix A step 4 SC-6.2-3 6.2 A recipient treats a phantom that a retained delta names as its source as a transit phantom whatever its cone classification. SC-6.3-1 6.3 Against a cone-ignorant server the requester filters locally: it stores in-cone artifacts, records elided phantoms for the remainder and reports the counts. not yet implemented: the sync extension, Appendix A step 4 SC-6.3-2 6.3 A cone-aware server should advertise the capability. not yet implemented: the sync extension, Appendix A step 4 SC-6.4-1 6.4 An operation over a sparse store that crosses the cone resolves elided phantoms by a targeted request or by the policy form, which is recommended for lasting intent. not yet implemented: demand fetch, Appendix A step 4 SC-6.4-2 6.4 With no configured peer the operation refuses, and the diagnostic names the class (the count elided by the cone and the absence of a peer), never missing or corrupt. not yet implemented: demand fetch, Appendix A step 4 SC-7-1 7 Derived caches are cone-independent: their keys do not incorporate the cone. SC-8-1 8 The member count and member length of a cone are bounded with the same limits applied to F-card filenames. the cone's members are bounded (255 members, 4096 bytes each, zit's bounds); the cone card itself is Appendix A step 4 SC-8-2 8 The server-side tree walk on cone requests carries the depth and visited-node bounds of single-name lookup. not yet implemented: the sync extension, Appendix A step 4